Legislature(2007 - 2008)BARNES 124
03/26/2008 08:30 AM House FISHERIES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Overview: Round-table Discussion: Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES
March 26, 2008
8:40 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Paul Seaton, Chair
Representative Craig Johnson
Representative Gabrielle LeDoux
Representative Bryce Edgmon
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Lindsey Holmes
Representative Kyle Johansen
Representative Peggy Wilson
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
OVERVIEW: ROUND-TABLE DISCUSSION: STATUTORY AND REGULATORY
TOOLS TO ADDRESS OVER ESCAPEMENT AND FOREGONE HARVEST IN BRISTOL
BAY AND WESTWARD REGIONS
- HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
No previous action to record
WITNESS REGISTER
JOHN HILSINGER, Director
Division of Commercial Fisheries
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
JEFF REGNART, Central Regional Supervisor
Division of Commercial Fisheries
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
JIM MCCULLOUGH, Central Regional Supervisor
Division of Commercial Fisheries
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G)
Kodiak, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
ROBERT HEYANO, President
Bristol Bay Regional Seafood Development Association (BB-RSDA)
Dillingham, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
BOB WALDROP, Executive Director
Bristol Bay Regional Seafood Development Association (BB-RSDA)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
JERRY MCCUNE, Lobbyist
United Fishermen of Alaska (UFA)
Cordova, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
KRIS NOROSZ, Government Relations
Icicle Seafoods
Petersburg, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
MARVIN EBNET
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
KRISTIN RYAN, Director
Division of Environmental Health
Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
DAVID HARSILA , President
Alaska Independent Fishermen's Marketing Association (AIFMA)
Seattle, Washington
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
ROBIN SAMUELSON, President and CEO
Bristol Bay Economic Development Corporation (BBEDC)
[No address provided]
POSITION STATEMENT: Participated in the round-table discussion:
Statutory and Regulatory Tools to Address Over Escapement and
Foregone Harvest in Bristol Bay and Westward Regions.
ACTION NARRATIVE
CHAIR PAUL SEATON called the House Special Committee on
Fisheries meeting to order at 8:40:16 AM. Representatives
Seaton, Johnson, LeDoux, and Edgmon were present at the call to
order.
^OVERVIEW: ROUND-TABLE DISCUSSION: STATUTORY AND REGULATORY
TOOLS TO ADDRESS OVER ESCAPEMENT AND FOREGONE HARVEST IN BRISTOL
BAY AND WESTWARD REGIONS
8:40:16 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the only order of business would be
a round-table discussion addressing the statutory and regulatory
tools to address over escapement and foregone harvest in Bristol
Bay and Westward regions. The state constitution requires the
legislature to endeavor to maximize the value of the resources
to benefit Alaskan's. The Alaska Department of Fish & Game
(ADF&G) has compiled reports, included in the committee packet,
based on monitored index streams indicating where escapements
have fallen short of the minimum, attained the minimum, or
exceeded goals. The minimum escapement is required to sustain a
healthy, continuous run of salmon. Where escapement goals are
exceeded the number represents a surplus of fish entering a
system, which could have been harvested, hence a foregone
harvest. In the case of sockeye salmon, he stated, this can be
detrimental, due to an overabundance of fry creating stress on a
system. Furthermore, 55 percent of the monitored streams, for
2006, experienced an over escapement, a situation which may
occur for various reasons. Chair Seaton explained that these
interest groups discussions are being held in an effort to
discover means for optimizing the fishery resources. He
encouraged participants to offer ideas for implementing change
in state regulation, consider utilization of fishing methods,
explore processing procedures, and suggest improved management
techniques.
8:46:25 AM
JOHN HILSINGER, Director, Division of Commercial Fisheries,
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), stated that the issue
of excess escapement is a complex topic that lies at the
intersection of conservation, economics, allocation, and the
practicalities of fisheries management. He agreed that the
dissection of this topic may be helpful, given the variables
that occur from year to year.
8:47:31 AM
CHAIR SEATON added that the effect on Bristol Bay and the
western regional fisheries of lost harvest, represented by the
chinook salmon by-catch in the Bering Sea, is another topic he
would like to hear addressed in today's discussion.
8:48:07 AM
JEFF REGNART, Central Regional Supervisor, Division of
Commercial Fisheries, Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G),
said the Bristol Bay sockeye salmon run is the largest in the
state, and the department conducts intensive monitoring on its
numerous watershed systems, to establish escapement goals. Over
escapement occurs due to several factors. He said:
One, the department's made a mistake in-season.
Either we should have fished earlier or more time, and
that does happen, on any given year, for any of the
systems. ... Second ... [a] forecast that might be
inaccurate. ... We're not prepared early in the season
for the large ... run that we're experiencing. It
comes to strategy of how we prosecute the fishery in-
season. ... You also have capacity issues ... that can
cause issues in-season, which can result in
potentially going over goals, [and] having lost
opportunity.
8:50:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX queried how quickly an in-season
management adjustment can be made, when an inaccurate forecast
is realized, and over escapement is occurring.
MR. REGNART responded that Bristol Bay fisheries are managed on
an hourly basis, and from tide to tide, during the peak of the
season. The department utilizes EO (emergency order) authority
to issue openings 5-6 times per day, which last an average of
10-12 hours. The department is able to react quickly to run
information sources, often within 2-3 hours, issuing an EO
accordingly.
8:55:01 AM
JIM MCCULLOUGH, Central Regional Supervisor, Division of
Commercial Fisheries, Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G),
said that the directed fisheries for chinook salmon only occur
in a few minor systems, in the central region. Sockeye are a
major target species, however a portion of the catch are fish
that are migrating to systems located in the Bering Sea and
North Pacific waters. Pink and chum salmon are the abundant
species, and coho are becoming more important throughout the
region. The central region fishery begins the first of June and
continues through October, due to each species being targeted,
as well as multiple runs. The department has established weirs
on the major sockeye systems, providing accurate counts. Pink
and chum escapements are estimated via aerial survey counts, and
those runs are managed using averages vs. exact counts. He
reported that industry plays a major role, regarding control of
the run escapement. When the Bristol Bay sockeye runs overlap
with those of the central region, processing capacity is over
taxed to handle the harvest from both areas. Some years have
seen fish transported to British Columbia, Canada, for
processing.
9:00:00 AM
CHAIR SEATON directed attention to the committee packet,
referred to the ADF&G report 5J08-1, [page 24], appendix D2, and
pointed out that several systems were noted, to wit: "Surplus
escapements were primarily due to lack of industry interest and
minimal fishing effort rather than any specific management
action." He asked why there was a lack of interest in these
systems, and whether fishing effort could be generated via
direct marketing techniques, or other methods. The included
systems were Cinder River, Meshik River, Bear River Early Run,
North Creek, Orzinski Lake, Mortensen Lagoon, and Thin Point
Lake.
MR. MCCULLOUGH many of these areas are unfortunately distant to
the necessary support infrastructure. Transportation costs,
combined with the price of processing, prohibit an economic
harvest.
9:03:08 AM
ROBERT HEYANO, President, Bristol Bay Regional Seafood
Development Association (BB-RSDA), explained that the
association has 1,800 members, who are experiencing loss of
economic opportunity in Bristol Bay, and he deferred to the
association's director to provide recommendations for rectifying
the situation.
9:04:09 AM
BOB WALDROP, Executive Director, Bristol Bay Regional Seafood
Development Association (BB-RSDA), said the association has been
in business about four months, after two years aborning. He
acknowledged the spirits, on all fronts, to assist in optimizing
the fishery. A possible solution would be to allow an
aggressive early season fishery. For the past three years, the
Bristol Bay region has experienced a foregone harvest worth $55
million wholesale, representing 39 million round pounds, with an
exvessel value of $22 million to the fishermen. He stressed the
magnificence of the Bristol Bay sockeye run, where the 2007 over
escapement totaled approximately 6 million fish, representing
more than the combined sockeye harvests in the remainder of the
state.
9:08:31 AM
CHAIR SEATON directed attention to ADF&G report J508-3, table 1
page 2 of 2 [report page 3], and asked if this is the data that
he is using in his calculations.
MR. WALDROP responded that he is actually starting from a mid
point estimate of the escapement goal, not the upper end, to
which the document refers.
CHAIR SEATON clarified that ADF&G has been focusing on
maintaining an escapement above the lower range, and below the
upper range. The 2007 numbers that the association is using
differ from the departments. He read the over escapement
figures from the report: 2007 at 2.5 million sockeye, valued at
$8.87 million; 2006 at 2.69 million sockeye, valued at $8.5
million; 2005 at 1.4 million sockeye, valued at $5.3 million.
Apparently the association is using the same numbers, but is
calculating what is above the mid point vs. what is above the
upper range.
MR. WALDROP explained his method for interpreting the
department's figures.
9:10:59 AM
CHAIR SEATON asked for clarity on how Mr. Waldrop's
interpretation might interface with the numbers provided from
the department.
MR. REGNART responded the numbers in table 1, page 2 of 2 are
the upper end of the bound, and the numbers Mr. Waldrop is using
are from the mid point. The BOF, for regulatory purposes, uses
the mid point range as an in-season target, however the
department cannot manage the run appropriately utilizing that
figure.
MR. HILSINGER pointed out:
In the sustainable fisheries policy, ... [it]
specifies that, over time, the department will try to
distribute escapements evenly throughout the range of
a biological escapement goal range, which these are.
... Our policy for salmon management says that we
should have some escapements near the low end, some
escapements in the middle, and some escapements at the
high end. So we don't, by policy, try to target any
particular point within the range.
9:14:21 AM
REPRESENTATIVE EDGMON, considering the sustainable fisheries
policy, asked does that preclude the department from allowing an
early harvest on the run, minimizing the bottleneck, which
traditionally occurs in early July.
MR. REGNART answered that the policy would not preclude an early
fishery. Further, the department is preparing a revised 2008
outlook for Bristol Bay, which will include a more aggressive
approach beginning June 1.
REPRESENTATIVE EDGMON queried if this indicates the department
is assessing a more aggressive early season, or will the
opportunity be instituted.
MR. REGNART said the department is taking a more aggressive
stance to allow more fishing days per week, from June 1 through
the third week of June, for the sockeye fisheries in the
eastside districts. The Nushagak district is managed for the
chinook harvest and will require a different approach.
MR. WALDROP stressed the magnitude of the issue. He described
how an early season, aggressive harvest, would be a benefit to
economic exploitation of the sockeye run, and provide an early
season operational "shake-down" for the processors. It is
encouraging that the department is looking at implementing this
possibility, he opined.
9:21:33 AM
JERRY MCCUNE, Lobbyist, United Fishermen of Alaska (UFA),
inquired if there will need to be more transportation, ice
machines, or other infrastructure support to implement this
plan.
MR. WALDROP stated the infrastructure is shallow, in the bay,
and needs to be bolstered, however, those are long term
solutions that will be brought on-line in the coming years.
MR. MCCUNE offered that RSDAs in every region could use
infrastructure support to help deliver a quality product to
market.
9:23:33 AM
KRIS NOROSZ, Government Relations, Icicle Seafoods, acknowledged
the intensity of the Bristol Bay fishery. Fully funding the
department would be helpful to expand management opportunities,
and help the department to afford every available tool to
maximize harvest possibilities. She pointed out that
predictability is difficult, and this area becomes a reactionary
fishery, which the department manages admirably. Attempting to
not go beyond the mid point range could result in some streams
not receiving enough escapement. There is over-escapement
despite best efforts, which appears to be unavoidable. Icicle
Seafoods has a salmon task force, which meets regularly to
discuss post and pre season opportunities. Cultivating
discussions, such as these, the department's move towards early
harvest, and continued dialogue with other regions, are all
helpful in means for creating constructive solutions, she
opined.
9:28:24 AM
CHAIR SEATON agreed that funding plays a part, but dialogue
helps to identify the tools necessary for improved harvest and
product. He referred to the round-table discussion on the
southeast region [House Special Committee on Fisheries meeting
3/19/08], and described the concerns that arose regarding the
direct market vessels. The fishermen find that they are
inhibited in only being able to process their individual boats
catch. If they purchase another boats catch, then they must be
permitted as a floating processor and work under constraints
that are prohibitive for a direct marketer. However, four or
five vessels working together, could jointly gut and gill, ice,
and transport a value added product that otherwise might not
provide an economical harvest. The fast and furious Bristol Bay
fishery may not apply, but he asked if other reaches of the
westward region have similar issues with remote areas that could
be served by allowing this type of joint effort.
9:30:44 AM
MR. MCCUNE said that not allowing the direct marketer to
purchase fish, to back fill an order, is an inhibiting factor.
Why a floating processor permit would be required by the state,
does not appear to be in concert with the federal regulations,
he opined. Every direct marketer stands on their reputation,
which should be enough to ensure a quality product.
9:32:30 AM
KRISTIN RYAN, Director, Division Of Environmental Health,
Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), stated that a
chart has been generated to clarify what process can be
completed, by whom, and what permit is required. The intent of
the direct market fishing vessel permit was created to allow
fishermen to sell their catch, while maintaining sanitation
standards. Cleaning under a covered area, clean water
availability, and labeling the product in a traceable manner,
are among the many requirements. In this way, fishermen have
been able to cultivate a niche market, for a quality product not
handled by a processor; a program invoked ten years ago.
Restricting the program to the boat catch only, has provided a
delineation of the fundamental difference between a fisherman
and a processor. The quantity of fish is restrictive, as
fishing boats are not intended to process large numbers fish.
Additionally, a category was implemented, to support fishermen
who have a foot in both worlds, thus the small processor.
Regulations for a small processor require safety measures beyond
what the direct marketer must meet, to further protect the
product from pests and dust. Boats that are 26 feet, have been
outfitted with a fully enclosed, collapsible structure, which
meets compliance standards. She explained that a small
processor may process their product anywhere, however the direct
marketer is restricted to processing on the fishing grounds.
Accommodating the person who wants to process more than their
boats catch, has created an issue which DEC is attempting to
address in the best way, working with the fishermen to solve the
conflicts.
9:36:49 AM
CHAIR SEATON pointed out that transporter vessels have been
implemented in some areas, as a mechanism that creates a small
cooperative. The point of sale regulation has been relaxed to
allow the transporter permit to be utilized. This indicates
that there may be other ways to work within regulations to help
solve the issue. Some fishermen may not be aware of the free
transport permit opportunity, he opined.
9:38:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX clarified the structures required: a
covered work space for the individual, direct market fisherman;
and a fully enclosed area for the small processor.
MS. RYAN responded that the goal is to keep dust and pests out
if the area where the meat is exposed. By restricting the
direct marketer to process their fish 1 ½ miles off shore, only
a cover is necessary for warding off bird droppings; dust and
flies are not present when at sea. However, a processor can
conduct business anywhere, and are required to have a fully
enclosed facility, which can be can be a collapsible tarp
structure with fly walls.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX queried, if someone wants to buy another
boats fish, on the fishing grounds to process with their own
catch, what's the purpose of requiring that they have an
enclosed structure.
MS. RYAN said, when another boat's catch is handled, the dynamic
is shifted from being a fisherman to being a processor.
Purchasing fish to sell to the public, puts the fisherman into
another realm, hence the additional requirements.
CHAIR SEATON directed the participants back to the day's topic
of over escapement.
9:41:50 AM
MARVIN EBNET, introduced himself as a Bristol Bay set net
fisherman, with a focus on the Ugashik River district. He
reported he has observed the up-river run continuing for a full
month after the department has pulled the counting towers, in
the fall. He suggested that, taking this into consideration,
the escapement numbers may be significantly under reported.
Further, he opined that the two major issues in Bristol Bay are
processing capacity, and tender availability, inhibits the
ability to process the harvest, and effectively limits the
fishermen's catch in the Ugashik district. Processing capacity
either needs to be ramped up in some way, or foreign processors
allowed to assist with the volume. The tender capacity has been
reduced, due to the crab rationalization, compounding the
processing problem.
9:45:12 AM
CHAIR SEATON called attention to a letter [e-mail] in the
committee packet, dated March 25, 2008, from Erick Sabo,
regarding correspondence from Trident Seafoods addressing the
Ugashik situation. The letter makes clear that handling
capacity for the Ugashik run will not be available from Trident,
and possibly not from other buyers. He asked if this appears to
be an anomaly, and whether the anticipated 2008 run will lead to
over escapement.
MS. NOROSZ stated that she is not familiar with the letter from
Trident. She has been to the Ugashik area and observed the
fishery. Historically, the Ugashik has been a difficult area to
service, without many fishermen participating, and being an area
that has not had a cannery. The capacity survey that was
conducted this year, indicates that there will be adequate
processing capacity in Bristol Bay, however, she declined to
address the Ugashik situation directly.
9:47:31 AM
CHAIR SEATON referred to the ADF&G report escapement table, and
pointed out the Ugashik had 1,270,000 fish last year, but the
preceding six years do not indicate over escapement. He
inquired if the department is concerned for the Ugashik district
goals.
MR. REGNART responded that the department has received a copy of
the letter. He pointed out how the Ugashik, on any given year,
presents two concerns: The processors interest in operating in
that area, as it is remote represents an expensive endeavor.
Also, it is difficult to attract the fleet to the area, as they
must relocate from a producing district, and possibly have to
wait in Ugashik for the run to arrive.
9:50:13 AM
DAVID HARSILA, President, Alaska Independent Fishermen's
Marketing Association (AIFMA), stated that over escarpment
issues are compounded by processor capacity limiting the pounds
of fish that a fisherman can deliver on any given opening. He
predicted that the situation may worsen in the coming years;
2009 and 2010. Early fishing efforts were attempted in 2004,
and in 1980, with mixed results. Inviting new processors in may
be the most helpful solution, he opined.
9:53:07 AM
ROBIN SAMUELSON, President and CEO, Bristol Bay Economic
Development Corporation (BBEDC), referred to ADF&G table 1, page
2 of 2, [report 5J08-03], and suggested that an escapement
analysis should be considered from the medium range, for
improved accuracy. The over escapement figures indicate a loss
of economic opportunity between $8-$16 thousand dollars, for
each permit holder, depending on how the numbers are
interpreted. He reported that a major portion of the processing
capacity in the area has been lost, and every bay has seen
harvest limits imposed on the fishermen. A number of the
processors closed down, or slowed capacity, when the price of
salmon dipped to $.40 cents. These actions have had dramatic
impacts on the fishermen, during the last five years. An
example was the early season Igiugig catch, when one day saw a
million fish brought in. He said that the entire processing
sector could not recover from that situation, for the remainder
of the season, effecting other fishing districts in the bay in
the form of fishing limits and closures. The BBEDC submitted a
request to the governor's office, for a 2008 processing/capacity
survey, to enable foreign processors to enter the bay and assist
should a surplus be evident. He said he was dismayed when he
read the survey, which indicated confidence by the current
processors to handle the run. However, a run projected to be 40
million fish, with a harvest expectation of 30 million, is
overwhelming. Haul-out boats have been suggested, but they are
heavily involved in the pollock fishery. He reported on the
chinook by-catch, as part of the pollock fishery. Scale
analyses indicate that the majority, 66 percent, of the 130
thousand chinook by-catch, are bound for western Alaska. The
Bristol Bay chinook return has diminished, he reported, as well
as the Kuskokwim and the Yukon River, which may not be allowed a
commercial chinook harvest this year. He reiterated that
without the presence of foreign processors, this year will again
see limits on harvest, and the chronic problem of Ugashik will
continue. The lost economic opportunities cannot be ignored.
He suggested bringing in foreign processors to handle the custom
processing. Further, he proposed an opening from 6/1-22, with
the setnetters on 24 hours per day in the eastside districts,
and allowing the drift net fishery to operate through 6/17, and
then begin the regulation process, or not, depending on need.
The BBEDC has invested millions in ice barges, slush bags,
insulated totes, fish hold insulation, and other means to
increase the value of these fish by $1.00 or more per pound. He
strongly urged the department to consider these options.
10:01:25 AM
CHAIR SEATON asked if the size of the anticipated run is
expected to accentuate the problems experienced in the Ugashik
and other out lying areas.
MS. NOROSZ, speaking only on behalf of Icicle Seafoods, which
traditionally serviced Ugashik when the fleet is present, said
the company does expect to be able to handle the run, based on
the current capacity study. She said:
There is a lot of risk and down side, when we talk
about bringing in foreign floaters. The number of
processors, in Bristol Bay, is not limited. Anybody
that wants to process can come in there with a U.S.
hull and process. My main concern, when we talk about
bringing in foreign processors, is the risk that we
take to the Alaska brand, and the risk that we take to
people who have invested millions of dollars in that
region.
CHAIR SEATON noted that nothing is being promoted through this
discussion, however, the ramifications of a large, damaging,
over escapement needs to be considered.
10:03:39 AM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX inquired if a capacity survey is conducted
each year.
MS. NOROSZ responded this year one was specifically requested
for Bristol Bay, but, to her knowledge, the department did not
conducted a statewide survey.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked whether there is a precedent for
foreign processors being brought in for a fishery.
MS. NOROSZ answered, yes, certain fisheries, such as herring,
have been tended by foreign vessels. However, she stressed,
this is not about competition, but leveling the playing field.
CHAIR SEATON suggested that another facet is the Alaska buy-in
for a quality product, and he speculated on whether that control
could be established, by the state, on a foreign based vessel.
MR. SAMUELSON clarified that he advocates bringing in foreign
processors for custom processing only, and imposing
specifications that would protect the Alaska brand. Currently,
much of the product is shipped to China for processing.
10:06:12 AM
CHAIR SEATON requested suggestions continue to be submitted to
the committee. Additionally, he pointed out that the board made
some changes in 2007, allowing ADF&G to adjust regulations in
order to address over escapement in some areas; included in the
ADF&G report.
10:07:13 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Fisheries* meeting was adjourned at 10:07
a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|